Skip to main content

From Circles to Spirals: What Happens When Speed Changes?

In our last post, we explored how a particle moves along an elliptical path, using a parametric position vector: r(t) = \ That model assumed a constant angular speed, ω (omega). But real life isn’t always so smooth. What happens when ω is not constant? In this post, we’ll explore how changing speed affects the motion of a particle. We’ll go from elegant ellipses to beautiful spirals, and we’ll simulate them using **Octave**, a free programming tool for doing math and science with code. ---

Motion with Changing Angular Speed

In our original setup, we had: x(t) = a*cos(ωt) y(t) = b*sin(ωt) If ω is constant, the motion traces out an ellipse over and over again. But what if we let the angular speed change over time — for example: ω(t) = ω₀ + k\*t This means that as time increases, the angle grows **faster** (if k > 0) or **slower** (if k < 0). The position becomes: r(t) = \ where θ(t) = ∫₀ᵗ ω(s) ds = ω₀\*t + (1/2)*k*t² Now we’re dealing with **non-uniform angular motion**, and the particle no longer repeats its path. Instead, it spirals outward or inward, depending on how ω changes. ---

Visualizing the Spiral with Octave

Let’s write some Octave code to simulate the spiral. In this example, we’ll assume: * a = 5 * b = 3 * ω₀ = 2π (1 full loop per second) * k = 4π (acceleration in angular speed)
% Parameters
a = 5;
b = 3;
omega0 = 2 * pi;     % Initial angular speed
k = 4 * pi;           % Angular acceleration
t = linspace(0, 2, 1000);  % Time from 0 to 2 seconds

% Compute theta(t) = omega0*t + 0.5*k*t.^2
theta = omega0 * t + 0.5 * k * t.^2;

% Parametric spiral path
x = a .* cos(theta);
y = b .* sin(theta);

% Plot
plot(x, y);
axis equal;
title('Spiral Motion with Increasing Angular Speed');
xlabel('x');
ylabel('y');
---

What Happens in the Code?

* The angle θ(t) is growing faster than in the circular case. * That causes the particle to move faster around the ellipse — but because the angle is increasing non-linearly, the curve does not close. * Instead, each loop is slightly twisted and offset — the particle **spirals**. Try changing k to a negative value. You’ll see the spiral wind inward! ---

What Does This Teach Us?

  • When angular speed is not constant, ellipses become spirals.
  • This type of motion occurs in real-world systems — such as satellites losing speed or gaining momentum.
  • Math allows us to model and predict these fascinating motions precisely.
---

Try This Yourself:

  • Set k = 0 to recover elliptical motion.
  • Try omega0 = 0 and k > 0 to see a pure spiral from rest.
  • Plot theta(t) directly to understand how angular position grows over time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Mathematical Fluency?

What does it really mean for students to be mathematically fluent? If you’ve been in any math PD over the past few years, you’ve likely heard the phrase everywhere. We talk about fluency as something students should develop, strengthen, and demonstrate, but it can still feel abstract when we try to describe it in observable, classroom-ready terms. This post breaks down mathematical fluency into the two simplest frames we can use as teachers: what it looks like and what it sounds like . These descriptions can guide instruction, assessment, student goal-setting, and even walkthrough conversations with colleagues or administrators. What Mathematical Fluency Looks Like In a classroom where students are developing mathematical fluency, you see students making choices about strategies rather than following steps robotically. They use representations—number lines, diagrams, tables, graphs, manipulatives, symbolic expressions—and switch between them to make sense of a problem. They move ...

The Tribe of Math Mentors: 11 Questions Every Educator Should Answer

It is easy to get caught up in the vague, existential questions of education: How do I become a better teacher? How do I make math engaging? How do I survive the burnout? But as author Tim Ferriss noted when writing his book Tribe of Mentors, "Life punishes the vague wish and rewards the specific ask." When Ferriss set out to deconstruct the habits of world-class performers, he didn’t ask them broad questions about "the secret to success." He engineered 11 highly specific questions designed to bypass rehearsed answers and force his subjects to share actionable, vulnerable, and unconventional insights. Recently, I started thinking about how perfectly this methodology translates to our world. What if we asked these exact types of questions to master math teachers? What if we used them to guide the next generation of educators? Here is my best thinking of what Ferriss’s Tribe of Mentors questionnaire looks like when translated into the context of the mathematics classr...

Beyond Taylor Series: The Magic and History of Padé Approximations

If you have ever taken a calculus class, you probably remember the Taylor series. It is the mathematical magic trick that lets you turn complicated functions—like sines, cosines, and exponentials—into simple, infinitely long polynomials. For centuries, it has been a cornerstone of numerical mathematics. But the Taylor series has a dark secret: it frequently breaks. If a function has a vertical asymptote (a pole) or if you move too far from your starting point, the Taylor series spirals out of control into infinity. It is strictly bounded by what mathematicians call a "radius of convergence." Enter the Padé approximation . Instead of using a single polynomial to estimate a function, a Padé approximant uses a fraction (a ratio of two polynomials). This simple structural change unlocks a profound level of mathematical power, allowing us to see past the limits of Taylor series and model complex, chaotic systems in modern physics and engineering. A Brief History: From Franc...