Skip to main content

Energy on the Ellipse: Kinetic and Potential Energy in Motion

In our previous posts, we explored how a particle traces out an ellipse and what happens when its speed changes. But motion isn’t just about where and how fast something goes — it’s also about energy. Today, we’ll explore the kinetic and potential energy of a particle moving along an elliptical path. We'll use physics to understand the motion and simulate the energies using Octave. ---

The Position and Velocity Revisited

Let’s return to our position vector: r(t) = < a*cos(ωt), b*sin(ωt) > From this, the velocity is: v(t) = < -a*ω*sin(ωt), b*ω*cos(ωt) > This gives us the magnitude of velocity (speed): |v(t)| = ω \* sqrt( a²*sin²(ωt) + b²*cos²(ωt) ) ---

Kinetic Energy (KE)

Kinetic energy is given by the formula: KE = (1/2) \* m \* |v(t)|² So for our particle of mass m, we get: KE(t) = (1/2) \* m \* ω² \* ( a²*sin²(ωt) + b²*cos²(ωt) ) This energy varies over time as the particle speeds up and slows down along the ellipse. ---

Potential Energy (PE)

Let’s now imagine that the particle is in a potential field — such as a spring system or gravitational field. For simplicity, suppose: The vertical direction corresponds to height (like gravity),  Then the potential energy is based on y(t): PE(t) = m * g * y(t) = m * g * b * sin(ωt) This is not constant — the particle has more potential energy at the top of the ellipse. ---

Total Mechanical Energy

The total energy at any moment is: E(t) = KE(t) + PE(t) If no external forces are doing work (no friction or air resistance), then energy is conserved— though it flows between kinetic and potential forms. Let’s plot these in Octave. ---

Octave Code to Visualize Energy

We’ll use: a = 5, b = 3 (ellipse size) * ω = 2π (one cycle per second) * m = 1 kg * g = 9.8 m/s² 
% Parameters
a = 5;
b = 3;
omega = 2 * pi;
m = 1;
g = 9.8;
t = linspace(0, 1, 1000);  % One full cycle

% Position
x = a * cos(omega * t);
y = b * sin(omega * t);

% Velocity components
vx = -a * omega * sin(omega * t);
vy =  b * omega * cos(omega * t);
v_squared = vx.^2 + vy.^2;

% Energies
KE = 0.5 * m * v_squared;
PE = m * g * y;
E_total = KE + PE;

% Plot energies
plot(t, KE, 'r', t, PE, 'b', t, E_total, 'k');
legend('Kinetic Energy', 'Potential Energy', 'Total Energy');
xlabel('Time (s)');
ylabel('Energy (Joules)');
title('Energy on an Elliptical Path');
---

What Does the Plot Show?

* Kinetic and potential energy oscillate in opposite phases. * When the particle is highest (maximum PE), it is slowest (minimum KE). * When it's lowest, it moves fastest. * The **total energy remains constant** — confirming conservation of energy. ---

What Does This Teach Us?

  • Motion isn’t just geometry — it’s energy flowing back and forth.
  • Even in a simple ellipse, energy can be rich and dynamic.
  • This kind of model appears in planetary motion, spring systems, and pendulums.
---

Try This Yourself:

  • Change b to be closer to a and see what happens to the energy profile.
  • Try b = 0 to turn the ellipse into a horizontal line (pure cosine motion).
  • Add friction by subtracting a small amount from KE at each time step and observe energy loss.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Tribe of Math Mentors: 11 Questions Every Educator Should Answer

It is easy to get caught up in the vague, existential questions of education: How do I become a better teacher? How do I make math engaging? How do I survive the burnout? But as author Tim Ferriss noted when writing his book Tribe of Mentors, "Life punishes the vague wish and rewards the specific ask." When Ferriss set out to deconstruct the habits of world-class performers, he didn’t ask them broad questions about "the secret to success." He engineered 11 highly specific questions designed to bypass rehearsed answers and force his subjects to share actionable, vulnerable, and unconventional insights. Recently, I started thinking about how perfectly this methodology translates to our world. What if we asked these exact types of questions to master math teachers? What if we used them to guide the next generation of educators? Here is my best thinking of what Ferriss’s Tribe of Mentors questionnaire looks like when translated into the context of the mathematics classr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Beyond Taylor Series: The Magic and History of Padé Approximations

If you have ever taken a calculus class, you probably remember the Taylor series. It is the mathematical magic trick that lets you turn complicated functions—like sines, cosines, and exponentials—into simple, infinitely long polynomials. For centuries, it has been a cornerstone of numerical mathematics. But the Taylor series has a dark secret: it frequently breaks. If a function has a vertical asymptote (a pole) or if you move too far from your starting point, the Taylor series spirals out of control into infinity. It is strictly bounded by what mathematicians call a "radius of convergence." Enter the Padé approximation . Instead of using a single polynomial to estimate a function, a Padé approximant uses a fraction (a ratio of two polynomials). This simple structural change unlocks a profound level of mathematical power, allowing us to see past the limits of Taylor series and model complex, chaotic systems in modern physics and engineering. A Brief History: From Franc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Unlocking the Matrix: A Guide to Solving Systems of 3 Equations

    If you have ever felt like algebra is just moving letters around a page until a number falls out, solving systems of equations in three variables might seem like the ultimate boss battle. Instead of just dealing with x and y on a flat piece of paper, a third variable (like z, or in our case r, s, and t) brings the math into three-dimensional space. Every equation represents a flat plane, and solving the system means finding the exact 3D coordinate where all three planes intersect. But before we dive into a full 3x3 system, let's talk about what happens when the number of equations doesn't perfectly match the number of variables. The Goldilocks Problem: Too Many or Not Enough Equations? For a system to have a single, beautifully neat solution, you generally need exactly as many equations as you have variables. But what if the balance is off? Not Enough Equations (Underdetermined Systems): Let's say you have 3 variables but only 2 equations. This is like having two plane...
Post a Comment
Read more