Comparing Dedekind Cuts and Cauchy Sequences
Both constructions aim to "complete" the rationals , meaning to create a number system where every "approaching" sequence or gap is fully realized as a number.
| Feature | Dedekind Cuts | Cauchy Sequences |
|---|---|---|
| Basic object | A downward-closed set of rationals without a greatest element | A sequence of rationals that becomes arbitrarily close together |
| Intuition | A "cut" describes everything less than a real number | A sequence approximates a real number |
| Completeness | The set of cuts fills in all gaps | The set of limits of Cauchy sequences fills in all gaps |
| Key property | Each cut represents a real number, possibly irrational | Each equivalence class of Cauchy sequences represents a real number |
| Real number | A specific subset of | An equivalence class of Cauchy sequences |
| Least Upper Bound Property | The union of a set of cuts is a cut | Every bounded increasing sequence of Cauchy classes converges |
Constructing the Isomorphism
We define a mapping:
This function and its inverse together form a bijective (one-to-one and onto) correspondence between Dedekind cuts and equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences.
1. From Dedekind Cuts to Cauchy Sequences
Let be a Dedekind cut. Since is nonempty, downward closed, and has no greatest element, for each , we can choose such that:
Such a sequence is increasing and bounded above by , so it is a Cauchy sequence. Define:
Here, is the equivalence class of all Cauchy sequences converging to the same real number as .
2. From Cauchy Sequences to Dedekind Cuts
Let be a Cauchy sequence in , with real limit . Define:
This set is a Dedekind cut:
-
It is nonempty because and .
-
It is downward closed: if , then .
-
It has no greatest element because , or if it is, .
So , where is the cut below the limit of the sequence.
Proving the Isomorphism is Bijective
Injectivity of
Suppose are Dedekind cuts. Then there exists such that or vice versa. Thus, . So sequences from and from converge to different limits.
Hence . Therefore, is injective.
Injectivity of
Suppose are equivalent Cauchy sequences, meaning they have the same limit . Then .
Hence, respects equivalence classes, and the function is well-defined.
Surjectivity of
Let be a Cauchy sequence equivalence class. Define . Then , since the constructed sequence from approximates the same limit.
Thus, every real number (i.e., every class of Cauchy sequences) corresponds to a Dedekind cut. So is surjective.
Surjectivity of
Given a Dedekind cut , construct such that . Then , so every cut arises from some sequence.
Preservation of Arithmetic Structure
Let and be Cauchy sequences representing real numbers and .
Addition
Define . Then:
-
is Cauchy.
-
-
, and matches this.
Multiplication (Assume )
Define . Then:
-
is Cauchy.
-
-
, and
Summary Diagram
Concluding Statement
Dedekind cuts and Cauchy sequences are isomorphic models of the real numbers . The isomorphism is both injective and surjective (bijective), and it preserves arithmetic operations and order. These two views are mathematically equivalent, and both provide rigorous foundations for real analysis.
Comments
Post a Comment