Skip to main content

Why a Certain Entire Function Must Be Constant When Its Imaginary Part is Bounded

In this blog entry, we’ll explore a fascinating result from complex analysis, similar to the one we discussed previously about the real part of an entire function. This time, we’ll focus on the imaginary part and show that if it is bounded, the function must be constant.

Here’s the statement we aim to prove:

If f(z)f(z) is an entire function on the complex plane, and Im(f(z))\operatorname{Im}(f(z)) (the imaginary part of f(z)f(z)) is bounded above, then f(z)f(z) must be constant.

As before, we’ll break the proof into manageable steps and reference key theorems and ideas to make it easy to follow, even for those with just a basic background in complex analysis.


Step 1: Understanding the Problem

An entire function is a function that is holomorphic (analytic) everywhere on the complex plane. For f(z)f(z), we’re given that its imaginary part Im(f(z))\operatorname{Im}(f(z)) is bounded above, meaning there exists a real number MM such that:

Im(f(z))Mfor all zC.\operatorname{Im}(f(z)) \leq M \quad \text{for all } z \in \mathbb{C}.

Our task is to show that this condition implies f(z)f(z) is constant. The result follows from Liouville's Theorem and the harmonic properties of Im(f(z))\operatorname{Im}(f(z)).


Step 2: Define a New Function

To take advantage of boundedness, define the following function:

G(z)=eif(z).G(z) = e^{i f(z)}.

Why this choice? The exponential function ensures that both the real and imaginary parts of f(z)f(z) contribute in a manageable way, while its modulus can be analyzed to reveal important properties.


Step 3: Show That G(z)G(z) is Entire

Since f(z)f(z) is entire, the composition eif(z)e^{i f(z)} is also entire. This follows from the fact that the exponential function is entire, and the composition of two entire functions is entire. Thus, G(z)G(z) is holomorphic on C\mathbb{C}.


Step 4: Analyze G(z)|G(z)|

The modulus of G(z)G(z) is given by:

G(z)=eif(z)=eIm(f(z)).|G(z)| = \left| e^{i f(z)} \right| = e^{-\operatorname{Im}(f(z))}.

Since Im(f(z))M\operatorname{Im}(f(z)) \leq M for all zz, it follows that:

G(z)=eIm(f(z))eM.|G(z)| = e^{-\operatorname{Im}(f(z))} \geq e^{-M}.

Thus, G(z)|G(z)| is bounded below by eM>0e^{-M} > 0. Furthermore, because Im(f(z))\operatorname{Im}(f(z)) is bounded above, G(z)|G(z)| is also bounded above. Therefore, G(z)|G(z)| is bounded on C\mathbb{C}.


Step 5: Apply Liouville's Theorem

By Liouville's Theorem, any bounded entire function must be constant. Since G(z)G(z) is bounded and entire, G(z)G(z) is constant. Let’s denote this constant by cc:

G(z)=cfor all zC.G(z) = c \quad \text{for all } z \in \mathbb{C}.

Step 6: Conclude That f(z)f(z) is Constant

Recall that G(z)=eif(z)G(z) = e^{i f(z)}. If G(z)=cG(z) = c, then:

eif(z)=c.e^{i f(z)} = c.

Taking the logarithm (using the complex logarithm), we have:

if(z)=ln(c),i f(z) = \ln(c),

where ln(c)\ln(c) is a constant (since cc is constant and nonzero).

Dividing through by ii, we find:

f(z)=iln(c).f(z) = -i \ln(c).

Thus, f(z)f(z) is constant.


Step 7: Final Thoughts

This result complements our earlier proof about the real part of an entire function. It demonstrates how boundedness of either the real or imaginary part of an entire function forces the function to be constant. This is a testament to the rigidity of analytic functions over the complex plane.

Thanks for reading! If you have questions or comments, feel free to leave them below. Let’s keep exploring the beauty of complex analysis together!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Mathematical Fluency?

What does it really mean for students to be mathematically fluent? If you’ve been in any math PD over the past few years, you’ve likely heard the phrase everywhere. We talk about fluency as something students should develop, strengthen, and demonstrate, but it can still feel abstract when we try to describe it in observable, classroom-ready terms. This post breaks down mathematical fluency into the two simplest frames we can use as teachers: what it looks like and what it sounds like . These descriptions can guide instruction, assessment, student goal-setting, and even walkthrough conversations with colleagues or administrators. What Mathematical Fluency Looks Like In a classroom where students are developing mathematical fluency, you see students making choices about strategies rather than following steps robotically. They use representations—number lines, diagrams, tables, graphs, manipulatives, symbolic expressions—and switch between them to make sense of a problem. They move ...

The Tribe of Math Mentors: 11 Questions Every Educator Should Answer

It is easy to get caught up in the vague, existential questions of education: How do I become a better teacher? How do I make math engaging? How do I survive the burnout? But as author Tim Ferriss noted when writing his book Tribe of Mentors, "Life punishes the vague wish and rewards the specific ask." When Ferriss set out to deconstruct the habits of world-class performers, he didn’t ask them broad questions about "the secret to success." He engineered 11 highly specific questions designed to bypass rehearsed answers and force his subjects to share actionable, vulnerable, and unconventional insights. Recently, I started thinking about how perfectly this methodology translates to our world. What if we asked these exact types of questions to master math teachers? What if we used them to guide the next generation of educators? Here is my best thinking of what Ferriss’s Tribe of Mentors questionnaire looks like when translated into the context of the mathematics classr...

Beyond Taylor Series: The Magic and History of Padé Approximations

If you have ever taken a calculus class, you probably remember the Taylor series. It is the mathematical magic trick that lets you turn complicated functions—like sines, cosines, and exponentials—into simple, infinitely long polynomials. For centuries, it has been a cornerstone of numerical mathematics. But the Taylor series has a dark secret: it frequently breaks. If a function has a vertical asymptote (a pole) or if you move too far from your starting point, the Taylor series spirals out of control into infinity. It is strictly bounded by what mathematicians call a "radius of convergence." Enter the Padé approximation . Instead of using a single polynomial to estimate a function, a Padé approximant uses a fraction (a ratio of two polynomials). This simple structural change unlocks a profound level of mathematical power, allowing us to see past the limits of Taylor series and model complex, chaotic systems in modern physics and engineering. A Brief History: From Franc...